Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea: a randomised trial.

AIMS: Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin as an add-on to metformin plus sulphonylurea in patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients (N = 469) received canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg or placebo once daily during a 26-week core period and a 26-week extension. Prespecified primary end-point was change in HbA1c at 26 weeks. Secondary end-points included change in HbA1c at week 52 as well as proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0%, change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and systolic blood pressure, and per cent change in body weight, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides (weeks 26 and 52). RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly reduced with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg vs. placebo at week 26 (-0.85%, -1.06%, and -0.13%; p < 0.001); these reductions were maintained at week 52 (-0.74%, -0.96%, and 0.01%). Both canagliflozin doses reduced FPG and body weight vs. placebo at week 26 (p < 0.001) and week 52. Overall adverse event (AE) rates were similar across groups over 52 weeks, with higher rates of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis-related AEs seen with canagliflozin vs. placebo; these led to few discontinuations. Increased incidence of documented, but not severe, hypoglycaemia episodes was seen with canagliflozin vs. placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight, and was generally well tolerated in T2DM patients on metformin plus sulphonylurea over 52 weeks.

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin vs placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with background metformin. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, Phase 3 study was conducted at 169 centres in 22 countries between April 2010 and August 2012. Participants (N = 1,284) with type 2 diabetes aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.0% [53 mmol/mol] and ≤10.5% [91 mmol/mol]) on metformin therapy received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or placebo (n = 368, 367, 366, 183, respectively) for a 26 week, placebo- and active-controlled period followed by a 26 week, active-controlled period (placebo group switched to sitagliptin [placebo/sitagliptin]) and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis set. Randomisation was performed using a computer-generated schedule; participants, study centres and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26; secondary endpoints included changes in HbA1c (week 52) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP; weeks 26 and 52). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: At week 26, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced HbA1c vs placebo (-0.79%, -0.94%, -0.17%, respectively; p < 0.001). At week 52, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg demonstrated non-inferiority, and canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated statistical superiority, to sitagliptin in lowering HbA1c (-0.73%, -0.88%,-0.73%, respectively); differences (95% CI) vs sitagliptin were 0% (-0.12, 0.12) and -0.15% (-0.27, -0.03), respectively. Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26: -3.7%, -4.2%, -1.2%, respectively; p < 0.001) and sitagliptin (week 52: -3.8%, -4.2%, -1.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). Both canagliflozin doses reduced FPG and systolic BP vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) (p < 0.001). Overall AE and AE-related discontinuation rates were generally similar across groups, but higher with canagliflozin 100 mg. Genital mycotic infection and osmotic diuresis-related AE rates were higher with canagliflozin; few led to discontinuations. Hypoglycaemia incidence was higher with canagliflozin. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Canagliflozin improved glycaemia and reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106677 FUNDING: This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

AIMS: Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor in development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin were evaluated in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. METHODS: In this 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, subjects (N = 584) received canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg or placebo once daily. Primary endpoint was the change from baseline in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 26. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c < 7.0%; change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG) and systolic blood pressure (BP); and percent change in body weight, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: At week 26, HbA1c was significantly reduced from baseline with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg compared with placebo (-0.77, -1.03 and 0.14%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Both canagliflozin doses significantly decreased FPG, 2-h PPG, body weight and systolic BP (p < 0.001 for all), and increased HDL-C compared with placebo (p < 0.01 for both). Overall incidences of AEs were modestly higher with canagliflozin versus placebo; rates of serious AEs and AE-related discontinuations were low and similar across groups. Incidences of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections and osmotic diuresis-related AEs were higher with canagliflozin; these led to few discontinuations. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was low across groups. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin treatment improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and was generally well tolerated in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

Effect on glycemic control of the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin in patients with T2DM.

AIMS: This study evaluated the effects on glycemic control of the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin in patients with mild-to-moderate, but suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 122 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled (A1c 7-8.5%) on metformin (> or =1000 mg/day for > or =3 months) were randomized to 16 weeks treatment with 2.5 mg/day glipizide GITS (n=61) or placebo (n=61), in addition to their current metformin dose. The primary efficacy variable was the change in A1c from baseline to endpoint. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin concentrations, lipid profile and safety variables were also measured. RESULTS: The addition of glipizide GITS to metformin gave significantly greater improvements in mean A1c and FPG from baseline to endpoint than placebo addition (p<0.0002). Significantly more patients in the glipizide GITS group than in the placebo group achieved the target A1c level of A1c<7.0% (p<0.0001) and an A1c<6.5% (p<0.0033). Fasting insulin concentrations were similar in both groups and unchanged by treatment. Addition of glipizide GITS to metformin did not produce any significant or clinically relevant weight gain or changes in BMI. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin significantly improved glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy.

A novel mutation in the CAG triplet region of exon 1 of androgen receptor gene causes complete androgen insensitivity syndrome in a large kindred.

Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) is an X-linked inherited disease caused by mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene. We have previously reported the largest kindred of CAIS, with 17 46,XY psychosexual and phenotypic females who lack secondary sexual hair. Analysis of AR binding indicated a receptor-negative form of complete androgen insensitivity, and DNA linkage analysis indicated that the absent binding was not caused by a large AR gene deletion. Using PCR-single-strand DNA conformational polymorphism, PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and DNA sequencing, we have identified a novel mutation in the polymorphic CAG trinucleotide region of exon 1 of the AR gene, where a single adenine is inserted, or equivalently, a GC-dinucleotide is deleted at this region of the gene. The mutation results in a frameshift at amino acid 60 and a premature termination of the receptor downstream of the mutation. This predicts a mutant AR with only 79 amino acids in the amino-terminal of AR protein, prohibiting binding to the ligand, as well as the cognate DNA. The rest of the encoding regions of the AR gene in the affected subjects are normal. These results are consistent with previous ligand binding and DNA linkage analysis studies. This new mutation in the CAG trinucleotide area of exon 1 of the AR gene represents the first example of a defect in a CAG repeat causing CAIS in this large kindred. All previous reported variants in this region are changes in the number of triplet repeats.

Role of orlistat in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes. A 1-year randomized double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is an important risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with improved glycemic control and reduced cardiovascular disease risk factors, but weight loss is notably difficult to achieve and sustain with caloric restriction and exercise. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of treatment with orlistat, a pancreatic lipase inhibitor, on weight loss, glycemic control, and serum lipid levels in obese patients with type 2 diabetes on sulfonylurea medications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicenter 57-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 120 mg orlistat or placebo was administered orally three times a day with a mildly hypocaloric diet to 391 obese men and women with type 2 diabetes who were aged > 18 years, had a BMI of 28-40 kg/m2, and were clinically stable on oral sulfonylureas. Changes in body weight, glycemic control, lipid levels, and drug tolerability were measured. RESULTS: After 1 year of treatment, the orlistat group lost 6.2 +/- 0.45% (mean +/- SEM) of initial body weight vs. 4.3 +/- 0.49% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Twice as many patients receiving orlistat (49 vs. 23%) lost > or = 5% of initial body weight (P < 0.001). Orlistat treatment plus diet compared with placebo plus diet was associated with significant improvement in glycemic control, as reflected in decreases in HbA1c (P < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.001) and in dosage reductions of oral sulfonylurea medication (P < 0.01). Orlistat therapy also resulted in significantly greater improvements than placebo in several lipid parameters, namely, greater reductions in total cholesterol, (P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), triglycerides (P < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (P < 0.001), and the LDL-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (P < 0.001). Mild to moderate and transient gastrointestinal events were reported with orlistat therapy, although their association with study withdrawal was low. Fat-soluble vitamin levels generally remained within the reference range, and vitamin supplementation was required in only a few patients. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat is an effective treatment modality in obese patients with type 2 diabetes with respect to clinically meaningful weight loss and maintenance of weight loss, improved glycemic control, and improved lipid profile.

Luteinizing hormone pulsatility in subjects with 5-alpha-reductase deficiency and decreased dihydrotestosterone production.

The pattern of LH pulsatility in male pseudohermaphrodites with inherited 5 alpha-reductase-2 deficiency (5 alpha RD) and decreased levels of plasma dihydrotestosterone was compared to that in normal males. Analysis of 10-min plasma LH sampling during either a 10- or 24-h period demonstrated that the subjects with 5 alpha RD had 1) a mean plasma LH level, mean LH pulse amplitude, and mean plasma LH nadir that were approximately twice normal; and 2) a mean LH pulse frequency similar to that in normal males, whether described as pulses per h or pulses per study period. An increased plasma LH response to GnRH administration was also noted. The findings suggest that a deficiency of DHT results in decreased negative feedback at the level of the hypothalamus and/or pituitary, resulting in an increase in mean plasma LH, LH pulse amplitude, and LH responsiveness to GnRH. In response to increased LH, mean plasma testosterone (T), free T, and plasma estradiol (E2) are increased. The pulse amplitude is increased despite elevated plasma T and E2 levels; this underscores the importance of DHT in pulse amplitude regulation. LH pulse frequency is not decreased despite elevated plasma T and E2, raising the possibility that DHT deficiency increased pulse frequency that was normalized by increased T and/or E2. In conclusion, studies of LH pulsatility in subjects with 5 alpha RD suggest a role for DHT in the modulation of LH.

Complete androgen insensitivity Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

The syndrome of complete androgen insensitivity is an X-linked inherited disorder resulting in marked inhibition of androgen action. The following case illustrates a subject with complete androgen insensitivity who, despite being a genetic and gonadal male, presents as a phenotypic female with primary amenorrhea, normal breast development, and lack of axillary and pubic hair. The diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of the condition are discussed, as well as recently identified abnormalities in the androgen-receptor gene. The partial forms of androgen insensitivity are also included in the discussion.